The managed services industry has been solving the wrong problem. Not that anyone did anything intentionally wrong. In fact, it seemed like we were just following best practices conjured up by the best and the brightest in the industry. The geniuses were solving the wrong problem for years.
The problem was never yours to define. The vendor defined it, the analyst validated it, and the conference made sure everyone showed up already convinced. The client came back from the Microsoft event with a decision already made and handed it to you to implement. Your job was to make it work. You made it work.
Whether it was the right problem was never your question to ask. The experts had already answered it.
Here is what the right problem actually was. Your client couldn’t get the right information to the right person at the right time to make a better decision. Understanding stalled between the person who had it and the person who needed it. Decisions got made on incomplete information. The same issues recurred without explanation. Nobody could say exactly why.
The industry called this an access problem and sold storage and retrieval. Each new tool added another place where information lived. Each user developed their own interpretation of each tool — their own habits, their own workarounds, their own sense of what went where. Ten tools and fifty users isn’t sixty variables. It’s a combinatorial tangle nobody mapped because nobody could. The knowledge flow problem got worse with every purchase. The tool got blamed for poor adoption. The next tool got purchased.
Knowledge doesn’t care about tools. Whether understanding reaches the person who needs it has nothing to do with which tools you’re running. The industry was solving for access. The problem was always about meaning. Solving one does not touch the other.
Now the certainty that held all of this together is cracking. The work that required specialized expertise is being automated, and the clients who followed the experts are watching the experts scramble. The chain that ran from vendor to analyst to conference to client to MSP is visibly broken for the first time in thirty years.
That is the opening.
Not to sell the next tool. To ask the question the chain never allowed. What does it mean for knowledge to actually move through an organization — from the person who has it to the person who needs it, at the right time, in a form that changes what they understand and therefore what they decide?
That question has never appeared on a periodic review agenda and has never been the metric by which an MSP measured their own value.
It is now the only question worth asking.
For any client you manage — do you know how knowledge actually moves through their operation? Not where the files are. Where understanding stalls. What decisions keep going wrong because the right information never reaches the person making them. Nobody in the chain ever asked. The client didn’t know it was a question. You weren’t hired to ask it.
You can ask now.
Most MSPs will fill the opening with the next vendor’s pitch. AI tools layered on the same wrong infrastructure, producing the same insufficient outcome with better metrics.
The ones who ask the better question will build something the current model can’t touch.
The door is open. It won’t stay open.
The MSP Contrarian: Unstacking the Business Model
An independent publication. Not affiliated with, sponsored by, or particularly popular with any vendor in the managed services ecosystem. Subscriptions are free. Opinions are not.